NHL games

UTA @ STL

NHL Enterprise Center ·St. Louis · SOG UTA 23 · 29 STL
16
Final

Statlab take

baseline_gbm
Based on last 10 (STL) / 10 (UTA) games this season
UTA away
home STL
50% 50%

baseline_gbm trained on ~5,000 NHL games (54.8% test accuracy). NHL is high-variance — even good models hover near 60%. Treat as a soft lean, not a lock.

Season comparison

H2H this season: 1-2
UTA
Away
Metric
STL
Home
38-43
Record
43-38
47%
Win %
53%
3.0
GF/G
3.1
3.0
GA/G
2.9
WWLWW
L5
LLLWW

Team totals

UTA
STL
23
Shots
29
19
Hits
11
11
Blocks
21
2
Takeaways
2
27
Giveaways
21
22
PIM
18

Box score

Forwards
PlayerGAPSOGHit+/-
C Keller10120-2
N Schmaltz01110-1
D Guenther00011-1
A Kerfoot000020
J McBain000110
B Hayton000120
Defense
PlayerGA+/-BLKHit
M Sergachev01-111
S Durzi00-230
I Cole00-220
O Maatta00010
M Kesselring00-111
R Bortuzzo00001
Goalie
PlayerSavesShotsSV%GA
M Villalta000
K Vejmelka23290.7936

Statlab projections

Lineup from last game () · per-position MultiOutput regressor
# Player Pos Team G A SOG Hit DK
1 P Suter forw STL vs VAN 0.48 0.88 2.9 0.9 12.8
2 D Guenther forw UTA vs NSH 0.35 0.47 2.7 0.9 9.3
3 V Vanecek goal UTA vs TBL 9.1
4 C Keller forw UTA vs NSH 0.31 0.52 2.5 0.1 9.0
5 J Peterka forw UTA vs BUF 0.31 0.50 2.3 0.4 8.6
6 L Cooley forw UTA vs NSH 0.28 0.49 2.1 0.7 8.0
7 M Sergachev defe UTA vs NSH 0.11 0.44 1.7 7.8
8 N Schmaltz forw UTA vs NSH 0.28 0.37 2.4 0.2 7.8
9 B Hayton forw UTA vs NSH 0.23 0.31 1.9 0.5 6.4
10 S Durzi defe UTA vs NSH 0.08 0.30 1.4 6.3
11 A Kerfoot forw UTA vs NSH 0.20 0.27 1.8 1.0 5.7
12 K Stenlund forw UTA vs NSH 0.19 0.28 1.7 0.4 5.6
13 I Cole defe UTA vs NSH 0.05 0.17 0.9 5.4
14 N Schmidt defe UTA vs TBL 0.05 0.16 1.1 5.1
15 N DeSimone defe UTA vs NSH 0.06 0.20 1.1 4.6
16 O Maatta defe UTA vs NSH 0.05 0.21 1.1 4.6
17 J McBain forw UTA vs NSH 0.13 0.20 1.4 3.3 4.1
18 L Crouse forw UTA vs NSH 0.14 0.14 1.3 2.3 3.9
19 N Bjugstad forw STL vs NSH 0.14 0.15 1.3 1.3 3.8
20 L O'Brien forw UTA vs NSH 0.08 0.09 1.0 2.7 2.6

Trained on ~126k player-game rows since 2021. NHL single-game variance is high — these are central-tendency point estimates, not floor/ceiling ranges.